» » Evil: Different Kinds of Evil in the Light of a Modern Theodicy (Wissenschaft Und Religion)

epub Evil: Different Kinds of Evil in the Light of a Modern Theodicy (Wissenschaft Und Religion) download

by Paul Weingartner

  • ISBN: 0820464228
  • Author: Paul Weingartner
  • ePub ver: 1199 kb
  • Fb2 ver: 1199 kb
  • Rating: 4.9 of 5
  • Language: English
  • Pages: 159
  • Publisher: Peter Lang Publishing (January 1, 2003)
  • Formats: rtf doc lrf mobi
  • Category: Other
  • Subcategory: Humanities
epub Evil: Different Kinds of Evil in the Light of a Modern Theodicy (Wissenschaft Und Religion) download

This book is a logical and philosophical analysis of the problem of evil in the light. Omnipotence is acceptable, allwillingness is refutable.

This book is a logical and philosophical analysis of the problem of evil in the light. To the main question of theodicy three explanations are offered and it is shown that the attacks against theism with the help of the existence of evil, like Hume's and other arguments are either logical fallacies or use false or very problematic premises. The appendix shows that there are consistent theories with the theses: God is omniscient and omnipotent, whatever God wills is good, there are different evils including moral evil.

Different kinds of evil in the light of a modern theodicy. Many evils are contingent and avoidable since a global determinism is untenable. Series: Wissenschaft und Religion. This book is a logical and philosophical analysis of the problem of evil in the light of a modern theodicy. Definitions are given for several kinds of evil like basic evil, necessary evil, legitimate evil, illegitimate evil, moral evil. A special explanation is given for the fact: How evil accompanies the good. Can evil be desired at all? Omnipotence is acceptable, allwillingness is refutable.

The problem of evil is the question of how to reconcile the existence of evil and suffering with an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient God (see theism)

The problem of evil is the question of how to reconcile the existence of evil and suffering with an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient God (see theism). Or as the first known presentation by the Greek philosopher Epicurus puts it: "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence comes evil?".

he Untersuchungen zu Werten und Normen. Werte und Normen in Wissenschaft und Forschung. Different kinds of evil in the light of a modern theodicy. Das Problem des Übels in der Welt. Vom interdisziplinären Standpunkt. he Untersuchungen zu chen Themen. Literatur von und über Paul Weingartner im Katalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek.

Evil has become the subject of one book after another, but is one book unlike any other-by a. .

Evil has become the subject of one book after another, but is one book unlike any other-by a philosopher unlike any other. -Bill Moyers, NOW. Scintillating- a very rare thing in a philosopher. -Jonathan Ree, Times Literary Supplement. Provocative and profound. The traditional "theodicy" for this form of evil is that God gave us free will to choose between good and evil because our choice of good, freely chosen, is a "better" result for our world, and for the choosers, than a world of moral automata essentially being conditioned by positive reinforcement.

5) For the early modern period, these questions centered on the "theodicy" .

The problem of evil, in stark contrast to such skeptical speculations, is far more urgent and trenchant; it is "the place where philosophy begins, and threatens to stop" (ibid. The problem of theodicy is introduced through the figure of Alfonso X, king of Castille in 1252, and "the first Enlightenment hero" (14), according to Neiman.

As a response to the problem of evil, a theodicy is distinct from a defence. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. A defence attempts to demonstrate that the occurrence of evil does not contradict God's existence, but it does not propose that rational beings are able to understand why God permits evil.

Theodicy, (from Greek theos, god ; dikē, justice ), explanation of why a perfectly good, almighty, and . Although many forms of theodicy have been proposed, some Christian thinkers have rejected as impious any attempt to.

Theodicy, (from Greek theos, god ; dikē, justice ), explanation of why a perfectly good, almighty, and all-knowing God permits evil. The term literally means justifying God.

Theodicy (pronounced /θiːˈɒdɪsi/) is an attempted answer to the problem of evil. Theodicy is a specific branch of theology and philosophy that attempts to justify the behaviour of God. Theodicy may also be described as an attempt to reconcile belief in God with the perceived existence of evil

This book is a logical and philosophical analysis of the problem of evil in the light of a modern theodicy. Definitions are given for several kinds of evil like - basic evil, - necessary evil, - legitimate evil, - illegitimate evil, - moral evil. Many evils are contingent and avoidable since a global determinism is untenable. A special explanation is given for the fact: How evil accompanies the good. Can evil be desired at all? Omnipotence is acceptable, allwillingness is refutable. To the main question of theodicy three explanations are offered and it is shown that the attacks against theism with the help of the existence of evil, like Hume's and other arguments are either logical fallacies or use false or very problematic premises. The appendix shows that there are consistent theories with the theses: God is omniscient and omnipotent, whatever God wills is good, there are different evils including moral evil."

Related to Evil: Different Kinds of Evil in the Light of a Modern Theodicy (Wissenschaft Und Religion):